Cracks start at the peak
Fatigue life depends on the local stress at the notch root, not on the average. A Kt of 3 turns 100 MPa nominal into 300 MPa at the fillet.
Most fatigue cracks start at a notch, a fillet or a hole. Our consultants find the peak stress at these features for your design reviews, MRB dispositions and failure investigations, using the classical handbook methods of Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors and validated finite element analysis of the actual part. We also train your engineering teams to do it themselves.
Industries we supportTypical features we assess and teach in each industry
A change of section raises the local stress above the nominal value by the stress concentration factor Kt. A part that is safe on nominal stress can crack at a fillet of the wrong radius. Getting Kt right is the first step of every fatigue and static strength check.
Fatigue life depends on the local stress at the notch root, not on the average. A Kt of 3 turns 100 MPa nominal into 300 MPa at the fillet.
Kt against r/d shows how far a larger radius, a relief groove or a shallower step lowers the peak, before the drawing is released.
A radius below tolerance or a reworked hole: the as-found Kt and margin decide whether the part can be used as is, reworked or scrapped.
Many charts come from photoelastic tests on idealised specimens. Outside their range, or for a real part, a finite element model of the geometry gives the defensible value.
Project work for design, manufacturing and operations teams: from a quick handbook check in a design review to a full finite element study of a component, delivered as a clear report with the peak stress and the margin against your allowable. Fixed-price assignments or a retainer for ongoing support.
The classical solutions for notches, fillets, holes and machine elements, applied within their validity range.
A model of the real geometry when the part is outside the charts or the result is critical, built with our in-house, customised finite element approach.
Engineering evidence for parts made outside the drawing tolerance.
How much each dimension moves the peak stress.
Practical changes that reduce stress concentration, each checked by analysis.
The stress field at the origin, to support root-cause analysis.
Practical courses that build in-house capability, taught by practising consultants with worked examples, ideally from your own products. On site at your office or online; course notes, exercises and a certificate of participation for every attendee.
Kt, nominal stress definitions and the handbook charts of Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors; the common mistakes and how to avoid them.
Modelling notches, fillets and holes: symmetry, mesh at the notch root, convergence, validation and reading the results with confidence.
From Kt to the fatigue notch factor: notch sensitivity, mean stress, S-N data and design margins for real components.
Dispositions of out-of-tolerance parts: as-found Kt, peak stress, tolerance sensitivity and the documentation reviewers expect.
Fillet shapes, relief grooves and holes, contact positions: practical changes that lower the peak stress, with their effect quantified.
A course built around your parts, codes and tools, for a team or a whole engineering department, with hands-on sessions in our in-house software.
Plan a courseTypical stress concentration problems, each solved with our in-house finite element software. Select a case to watch the analysis from geometry to peak stress.
A round-ended lug loaded through a pin with 1.5 % diametral clearance. The pin contact is solved in the model; the peak sits on the hole edge just off the net section, where fatigue cracks in lugs start.
Illustrative case computed with PY-Kt (own finite element solver); dimensions and load chosen for illustration.
Case videos · select a category
A round-ended lug loaded through a pin with 1.5 % diametral clearance. The pin contact is solved in the model; the peak sits on the hole edge just off the net section, where fatigue cracks in lugs start.
A T-head, as in a blade root or a bolt head, pulled through the shank and supported on its bearing faces. A 2 mm fillet on a 10 mm shank keeps the peak at about three times the shank stress.
A Ø30 mm hole 20 mm below the centre line of a 100 mm deep beam under bending. The governing point is on the compression side of the hole; the tension and compression edges are both checked.
A Ø30 mm shaft with a 1 mm radius U-groove, as for a retaining ring, transmitting 350 N·m. The shear stress peaks at the groove root; the axisymmetric torsion model gives it directly.
A close-coiled compression spring wound from 4.2 × 3 mm rectangular wire. The shear stress over the wire section is solved as a curved bar in torsion; the peak is on the inside of the coil.
A Ø200 mm vessel whose wall changes from 8 to 12 mm with a 3 mm outside fillet, under 20 MPa internal pressure. The meridional stress peaks in the fillet; the axisymmetric model includes the local wall bending at the step.
The same route for one fillet or a full design review: a fixed scope, a clear report and a debrief with your team.
The classical route, as set out in Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors: reduce the geometry to dimensionless ratios, enter the chart for the load case, read Kt and multiply by the nominal stress. It is fast and transparent, and it is the first value in every assessment we do.
For each geometry family we have built a database of converged finite element results over the full range of the dimensions. The handbook value and the finite element value are shown side by side, so a difference is seen before it matters.
Our consultants use our in-house software PY-Kt on every project, and course participants use it in the hands-on sessions: the handbook methods and a validated finite element solver in one application, from the geometry to the peak stress, the margin and the report.
The library covers the design charts of Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors (W. D. Pilkey and D. F. Pilkey), Chapters 2 to 5, with the analysis and design methods of Chapter 6. Every case has the handbook methods; the finite element model can be run for any dimensions, including those outside the charts.
U, V and flat-bottom notches in bars and plates; circumferential grooves in shafts. Tension, bending, torsion.
Stepped flat bars and shafts, lands, tubes, vessel walls; elliptical and compound fillets.
Circular, elliptical, rectangular and triangular holes; rows and patterns; beams with holes; shear.
Keyseats, splines, gear teeth, T-heads, lugs, curved bars, springs, crankshafts, U-members, dished heads.
We use the classical solutions where they apply and a validated model of the real part where they do not, and we explain every step, in a report or in a classroom.
Stress analysis, fatigue and fracture mechanics for design, manufacturing and in-service problems, in one team.
A customised finite element approach built for stress concentration, validated against commercial FEA tools.
Geometry, nominal stress, Kt, peak stress and margin, with every assumption stated for your reviewers.
Courses built on real cases, so your engineers take the methods straight back to their own work.
We are an engineering consultancy for stress analysis, fitness-for-service and fracture mechanics, and we train engineering teams in the same methods. We help designers, manufacturers and operators find the peak stress in their parts and decide with confidence.
Our stress concentration work ranges from a single fillet radius in a design review to MRB dispositions and finite element studies of complete components, and from a single course to customised training programmes for whole departments. For in-service flaws see our fitness-for-service services.
Tell us about the project, the support or the training you need. For a project or consultancy support: the part, the feature and the load; we reply with the method, the data we need and a time and cost estimate. For training: the team, the topics and the dates.